Ain’t Personal no mo no Obsession neither. It’s purely business. Trust me. How about delisting al-Qaeda? Bitch. Al-Qaeda got mo balls than those Tax-Fugitive-Faggots in Israel to go after Iran nuke walk-in-circus. Al-Qaeda can Fuck Hezbollah Muthafukahuhs, Assad and Iranian-Bitch-States in Iraq, Bahrain, Qatif & Kurdistan.

Taxing Ahmadinejad on News ain’t smart but stooopid. Everybody knows the-Iran-blame-game played by 6 consecutive us presidents in the Whitehouse. – sexagenarian’s Space – Obaid Karki’s blog.

And Hillary Finally made her mind to let Maryam Khanum and her MEK Fatasses go looose. Hillary ain’t only Fucking Khomeini in the ass and taming Israel by Delisting of Mujahedin-e Khalq outta Terrorists House-of-Pain but fucking her husband too in her conquest to Redherring American fools attention away from Bill Clinton dubious propinquity with the present Iranian Regime. Hillary needs to clutch her Secretary of State Job next term. Taxing Ahmadinejad on News ain’t smart but stooopid. Everybody knows the-Iran-blame-game played by 6 consecutive us presidents in the Whitehouse. USA is threatening to Fuck Iran for the past 6 decades. Everybody is happy waiting. Nothing to lose but a fleet of F-35 jetfighter that Israel will get from America for free. Courtesy of the Islamic Revolution of Iran. Who cares? its $40B for good cause. Americans ain’t adult enough to get hold of their wealth wasted left and right by corrupt politicians. Ain’t Personal no mo no Obsession neither. It’s purely business. Trust me. How about delisting al-Qaeda? Bitch. Al-Qaeda got mo balls than those Tax-Fugitive-Faggots in Israel to go after Iran nuke walk-in-circus. Al-Qaeda can Fuck Hezbollah Muthafukahuhs, Assad and Iranian-Bitch-States in Iraq, Bahrain, Qatif & Kurdistan. Quit al-Qaeda Goose Chase. Everybody knows that al-Qaeda is still DoD’s darling Special Contractor like Blackwater & other Headhunters. Drones ain’t workn’ no mo. It is killing elders, women & Sleeping Babies. Sack all those Stooopid Atari Boys running ‘em. They fretfully aim at anything moving. Their IT-Penetration is zero zilch nada. It is over. Game up. DoD is Fucked Up. Get the hell outta there. Bring your trailers boys back to Dixie.

Now Shut-up, Sit-down & Listen

Here’s is some Mind-steroid-Must-Read Office of the Spokesperson Media Note Whitewashes from The Secretary of State. Your discretion is advised

DELISTING OF THE MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

Washington, DC

September 28, 2012

The Secretary of State has decided, consistent with the law, to revoke the designation of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) and its aliases as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) under the Immigration and Nationality Act and to delist the MEK as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist under Executive Order 13224. These actions are effective today. Property and interests in property in the United States or within the possession or control of U.S. persons will no longer be blocked, and U.S. entities may engage in transactions with the MEK without obtaining a license. These actions will be published in the Federal Register. With today’s actions, the Department does not overlook or forget the MEK’s past acts of terrorism, including its involvement in the killing of U.S. citizens in Iran in the 1970s and an attack on U.S. soil in 1992. The Department also has serious concerns about the MEK as an organization, particularly with regard to allegations of abuse committed against its own members. The Secretary’s decision today took into account the MEK’s public renunciation of violence, the absence of confirmed acts of terrorism by the MEK for more than a decade, and their cooperation in the peaceful closure of Camp Ashraf, their historic paramilitary base. The United States has consistently maintained a humanitarian interest in seeking the safe, secure, and humane resolution of the situation at Camp Ashraf, as well as in supporting the United Nations-led efforts to relocate eligible former Ashraf residents outside of Iraq.

Aside from all-that-jazz.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Time is up! Standup like a man or die like a coward 1000 times.

Obaid Karki is a Sexagenarian UAE Paleoconservative Provocateur Arabspringer with a Picassoic Attitude, Blackbelt Diehart Paulite Constitutionalist Libertarian, Diogenesist, Spinoziste, Qutbist, Kabbalist, Pantheon, Hexalingual, Automath, Antitribal-Gentiles-Cabal, Unaffiliated to State or any Religiosity Cult and Seigniorage Banksters Sharia Scam. In short. I am the one your mom never warned you about.

 

Related articles

• Am a Janitor. That’s to please Ahmadinejad’s Circus spectators to continue reading. Israelis pulled stooopid stunt using this clown as featured artist to convince the whole world that Ahmadinejad owns an atom bomb and within weeks he will be wiping Is
• US Delisted Terror Network Mujahideen e Khalq ( MKO ) from its Black List to put Iranian Govt under Pressure
• IRI senior advisor: No change in Iran policy towards US
• U.S. to remove Iranian group Mujahedin Khalq from terrorist list
• Iran Condemns US Decision to Take Exiled Group Off Terror List
• State Department set to take violent Iranian group off terror list
• Iran Lawmakers Seek Answers Over Currency Drop
• Ahmadinejad says election, not war, solution for Syria
• Iran has been able to finance imports despite West: Ahmadinejad
• Iran lawmakers seek answers over currency drop

Chinese, Koreans not only fucking Mongolian economy but they are fucking their women with their miniature penises to taint Mongolian bloodline.

Racism is becoming ever more common in Mongolia, where extreme, right-wing nationalist groups target especially Chinese citizens. They are not afraid of resorting to violence.

Tserenchunt, 25, and two of his friends are all dressed in black. He is wearing tinted sunglasses and has the tooth of a large animal around his neck. The three young men stand out among the pedestrians dressed in colorful clothes in the center of the Mongolian capital city, Ulan Bator. They met there in front of a school to distribute fliers.

“We want to save Mongolians from the threat of foreigners,” Tserenchunt says.

The three are members of the ultra nationalist organization “Dayar Mongol.” Such nationalist groups have seen a rise in popularity in recent years. They use Nazi symbols – the white swastika on red and the Hitler salute and worship Hitler.

Chinese and Koreans

Their hate is directed against foreigners living in Mongolia. Tserenchunt believes there is a Chinese and Korean conspiracy against Mongolia.

Many Mongolians are nomadic herders

“The Koreans flood us with their soap operas. They use them to make Korea seem attractive, so that our men will go over there to work. They try to convince our women that Korean men are good catches,” he says.

He is also convinced that the Chinese are sent to the country by their government to destroy Mongolia.

“They want to rot us pure blooded Mongolians out. We have been enemies from the very beginning. That won’t change.”

Many Mongolians fear the economic and political domination of China.

Distrust

But it isn’t only the followers of “Dayar Mongol” who believe they must protect themselves from foreign influence. Prejudices are not uncommon among the country’s 2.8 citizens. Foreign construction companies that have recently started investing in Mongolia are received with great distrust.

“The foreigners are stealing our natural resources and nothing will remains for us.” Sentences like that are common. Many foreigners in Ulan Bator have reported being insulted and in some cases assaulted, especially in bars or clubs, where alcohol is involved.

But the far-right extremists take a step further, even. They vandalize stores and equipment belonging to foreign construction companies and sometimes even attack people. Members of “Dayar Mongol” made headlines for cutting the hair of women who meet with foreign men. Tserenchunt uses a harsh racist ideology to justify such actions.

“Our greatest threat is blood-mixing. Our women going out with foreign men for their money – that is unacceptable. There is a saying that goes, ‘if your women are impure, your country is done for.’”

Chinese and Koreans are increasingly unwelcome in Mongolia

The nationalists don’t even shudder at the thought of murder. Years ago, the group’s leader was sentenced to death for murder. It is the same story with other radical groups. The leader of the neo-Nazi group “Blue Mongolia” was also sentenced to death for racially motivated murder a few years ago. He had killed his daughter’s boyfriend because he studied in China.

Bitter irony

Bayaraa, who wishes not to uses his real name, is the owner of a Chinese restaurant in Ulan Bator. He has on occasion had the displeasure of crossing paths with neo-Nazis.

“They used to threaten us. They vandalized the store and broke what they could. They don’t do that anymore. But sometimes they come in and demand that we pay ‘protection money.’ When we refuse to do so, they threaten to go to the health department and tell them that our restaurant is unhygienic,” he says, adding, “But we are not afraid of inspections because everything he is according to regulation.”

Out of fear of a return of attacks, Bayaraa no longer hangs up signs written in Chinese characters, like many Chinese restaurants in Ulan Bator.

Bayaraa is in his mid-30s. He is wearing a yellow shirt and his hair is a typical-Chinese brush cut. The sad irony of his story is that he himself is Mongolian. He is from Inner Mongolia, which is part of China. He grew up in a traditional yurt. “When I was a child, we raised livestock. I didn’t learn Chinese until I was 18, when I joined the military.”

FBI TORTURE AMERICAN MUSLIM IN UAE

FBI TORTURE AMERICAN MUSLIM IN UAE
EXCLUSIVE: Yonas Fikre believes the US government played a role in his hellish three-month detention in the United Arab Emirates. By Nick Baumann | Tue Apr. 17, 2012 12:01 AM PDT
Last June, while Yonas Fikre was visiting the United Arab Emirates, the Muslim American from Portland, Oregon was suddenly arrested and detained by Emirati security forces. For the next three months, Fikre claims, he was repeatedly interrogated and tortured. Fikre says he was beaten on the soles of his feet, kicked and punched, and held in stress positions while interrogators demanded he “cooperate” and barked questions that were eerily similar to those posed to him not long before by FBI agents and other American officials who had requested a meeting with him.
Fikre had been visiting family in Khartoum, Sudan, when, in April 2010, the officials got in touch with him. He agreed to meet with them, but ultimately balked at cooperating with FBI questioning without a lawyer present and he rebuffed a request to become an informant. Pressing him to cooperate, the agents told him he was on the no-fly list and could not return home unless he aided the bureau, Fikre says. The following week he received an email from one of the US officials; it arrived from a State Department address: “Thanks for meeting with us last week in Sudan. While we hope to get your side of the issues we keep hearing about, the choice is yours to make. The time to help yourself is now.”
“When Yonas [first] asked whether the FBI was behind his detention, he was beaten for asking the question,” says his lawyer. “Toward the end, the interrogator indicated that indeed the FBI had been involved.”
Fikre made his way to the UAE the following year, where, he and his lawyer allege, he was detained at the request of the US government. They say his treatment is part of a pattern of “proxy” detentions of US Muslims orchestrated by the the US government. Now, Fikre’s Portland-based lawyer, Thomas Nelson, plans to file suit against the Obama administration for its alleged complicity in Fikre’s torture.
“There was explicit cooperation; we certainly will allege that in the complaint,” says Nelson, a well known terrorism defense attorney. “When Yonas [first] asked whether the FBI was behind his detention, he was beaten for asking the question. Toward the end, the interrogator indicated that indeed the FBI had been involved. Yonas understood this as indicating that the FBI continued to [want] him to work for/with them.” Nelson, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Council on American Islamic Relations are assembling a high-powered legal team to handle Fikre’s case in the United States.
Fikre’s story echoes those of Naji Hamdan, Amir Meshal, Sharif Mobley, Gulet Mohamed, and Yusuf and Yahya Wehelie. All are American Muslim men who, while traveling abroad, claim they were detained, interrogated, and (in some cases) abused by local security forces; the men claim they were arrested at the behest of federal law enforcement authorities, alleging the US government used this process to circumvent their legal rights as American citizens.
As Mother Jones reported in its September/October 2011 issue, the FBI has acknowledged that it tips off local security forces on the names of Americans traveling overseas that the bureau suspects involvement in terrorism, and that these individuals are sometimes detained and questioned. The FBI also admits that its agents sometimes “interview or witness an interview” of Americans detained by foreign governments in terrorism cases. And as several FBI officials told me on condition of anonymity, the bureau has for years used its elite cadre of international agents (known as legal attachés, or legats) to coordinate the overseas detention and interrogation by foreign security services of American terrorism suspects. Sometimes, that entails cooperating with local security forces that are accustomed to abusing prisoners. (FBI officials have told Mother Jones that foreign security forces are asked to refrain from abusing American detainees.)
It’s difficult to confirm US involvement in the detentions of Fikre or other alleged proxy detainees—indeed, plausible deniability is part of the appeal of the program. But what’s clear is that Fikre was on the FBI’s radar well before his detention in the UAE. (The FBI declined to comment on his case, as did the State Department.) Fikre, whose only previous brush with the legal system came when he sued a restaurant for having ham in its clam chowder, may have drawn the FBI’s interest because of his association with Portland’s Masjed-as-Saber mosque, where he was a youth basketball coach.
The mosque has been a focus of FBI scrutiny ever since the October 2002 case of the “Portland Seven,” in which seven Muslims from the Portland area were charged with trying to go to Afghanistan to fight with the Taliban in the wake of 9/11. (Six are now in jail; the seventh was killed in Pakistan.) Masjed-as-Saber was in the news again in 2010 when Mohamed Osman Mohamud, a 19-year-old Somali American who sometimes worshipped there, was charged with trying to detonate a fake car bomb provided by an undercover FBI agent.
More recently, three other men who attended Fikre’s mosque—Mustafa Elogbi, Michael Migliore, and Jamal Tarhuni—have found themselves on the no-fly list after traveling abroad. (The government’s use of the no-fly list to prevent American terrorist suspects from returning home after traveling overseas is currently the subject of a major ACLU lawsuit.)
Fikre’s case “really does make a mockery of the FBI’s use of watchlisting as a means of protecting the US,” says Gadeir Abbas, a staff attorney with the Council on American-Islamic Relations. “It’s not a means of protecting America—it’s a tool the FBI uses to put people in vulnerable positions.”
It “really does make a mockery of the FBI’s use of watchlisting as a means of protecting the US.”
Fikre, who is currently living in Sweden and believes that it would be unsafe for him to return to the United States, has given a series of videotaped interviews detailing his ordeal. His presence in Sweden beyond the three-month window allowed for tourist visas suggests that he has applied for permanent status there, and local media have so far refrained from reporting on the story for fear of affecting his case to stay in the country.
In the interviews, Fikre describes a series of events that are similar to the 2008 case of Naji Hamdan, a Lebanese American auto-parts dealer from Los Angeles who was then living in the UAE. Like Hamdan, Fikre claims he was detained in the UAE, tortured (including with stress positions and beatings on the soles of his feet, so as to not show marks), and asked about his activities in the United States. Like Hamdan, Fikre believed a western interrogator was present in the room at some points during his detention, because when he could peek out under his blindfold (“after being kicked/punched and falling over,” Nelson says) he occasionally saw western slacks and shoes. “In those occasions there was a fair amount of whispering,” Nelson added.
The similarities between the two cases were so striking that Michael Kaufman and Laboni Hoq, lawyers who are representing Hamdan in his separate case against the government, initially thought that Fikre had simply parroted Hamdan’s story. But once they heard more, they decided “the backstory of why the government was interested in him was reasonable and something that didn’t sound fabricated,” Kaufman said. “It seemed like a long way to go for a lie,” Hoq added.
A key difference between Hamdan’s and Fikre’s stories is that Hamdan eventually confessed—under torture, he now emphasizes—to being a member of several terrorist groups, including Al Qaeda. He ultimately spent 11 months in UAE custody before being deported to Lebanon, where he now runs a children’s clothing store. Despite an extensive FBI investigation, he was never charged in the United States.
Fikre, his lawyer says, “never confessed to anything”—”thankfully.”
“The FBI does this stuff because they can get away with it,” Nelson says. “But the bureau has totally destroyed any relationship it had with the Muslim community in Portland.”

QUIT BITCHN’ AND GET QUEEN’S MOTHER DNA TEST INSTEAD OF MOANING AS ROYALITY LOSERS Fury over book’s claim that Queen Mother and her brother were born to family’s French cook

QUIT BITCHN’ AND GET QUEEN’S MOTHER DNA TEST INSTEAD OF MOANING AS ROYALITY LOSERS

Fury over book’s claim that Queen Mother and her brother were born to family’s French cook

 

 

Extraordinary claims that the Queen Mother’s real mother was her family’s French cook are to be made in a sensational new book.

Aristocratic author Lady Colin Campbell says the domestic help may have been ‘an early version of surrogacy’ for both Elizabeth Bowes Lyon and her younger brother David.

The cook, an ‘attractive and pleasant Frenchwoman’ called Marguerite Rodiere, gave birth to the future Queen Elizabeth because her own mother Cecilia, who already had eight children, was unable to have any more.

 

Elizabeth with her mother Cecilla in 1923. It has been claimed in a new book that a cook gave birth to the future Queen Elizabeth because her own mother was unable to have any more children

According to Lady Colin, this explains the unflattering nickname ‘Cookie’ given to the Queen Mother by the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.

The astonishing claims are contained in ‘The Queen Mother, The untold story of Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, Who became Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother’, on sale next month.

The publication of the extracts could not have been more ill-timed, as the Queen on Friday held a service of remembrance for her beloved mother to mark the 10th anniversary of her death.

 

 

Held at St George’s Chapel in the grounds of Windsor Castle, it was attended by almost every senior member of the Royal Family and saw glowing tributes paid to the former Queen and her daughter, Princess Margaret, who died just a few weeks earlier.

The allegations immediately came under fire from royal experts.

Elizabeth Bowes Lyon at the age of seven. The Queen Mother’s exact date of birth in August 1900 as the fourth daughter of Lord Glamis, later 14th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, has always been disputed

Hugo Vickers said: ‘It is exactly ten years to the day that the Queen Mother died and I do not think it very nice at all to be promulgating these kind of theories at this time, particularly when the Queen has been celebrating her much loved mother’s life at Windsor today.

‘Lady Colin Campbell has been pushing this bizarre theory for some time in conversations etc. and I have to say I think it is complete nonsense. 

Elizabeth and her brother in 1904

‘You only have to look at pictures of the Queen Mother and her mother to see that they are related.’ 

Royal author Michael Thornton said: ‘I suppose that Georgie Campbell, whom I have known for many years, was faced with the same difficulty confronting all biographers of the Queen Mother: namely that everything of importance has already been said, leaving it difficult to find anything new to say.

‘But I have to say that I utterly disbelieve this claim on her part, and without DNA evidence to support it, there is absolutely no way now of proving it. 

‘I think it is unfortunate to publish this allegation in the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee year. 

‘It is bound to distress the Queen, and most particularly the Prince of Wales, who was devoted to his grandmother.’ 

The Queen Mother’s exact date of birth in August 1900 as the fourth daughter of Lord Glamis, later 14th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, has always been disputed.

It also remained unclear whether she was actually born in the back of a London ambulance or the family home, St Paul’s Waldenbury, in Hertfordshire.

Another puzzle has been why the Queen Mother, born the Honourable Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes Lyon, was given a French middle name.

 

In U.S. author Kitty Kelley’s notorious book The Royals, published in 1997, she suggested the Queen Mother was the daughter of a Welsh maid who worked in the family’s castle in Scotland.

But Lady Colin, who has herself had a colourful life after being raised as a boy during her early years in Jamaica, says the mother may have been another member of the household.

Elizabeth with her brother in 1915. Another puzzle has been why the Queen Mother, born the Honourable Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes Lyon, was given a French middle name

She writes: ‘For the fact is, royal and aristocratic circles had been alight for decades with the story that Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, while undoubtedly the daughter of the 14th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, was not the child of his wife Cecilia, nor was her younger brother David, born nearly two years after her on 2nd May, 1902.

‘The two Benjamins, as they were known in the Bowes Lyon family (in a Biblical allusion to the brother of Joseph, who was himself the product of a coupling between his father and his mother’s maid) were supposedly the children of Marguerite Rodiere, an attractive and pleasant Frenchwoman who had been the cook at St Paul’s Waldenbury and is meant to have provided Lord and Lady Glamis with the two children they so yearned for after Cecilia was forbidden by her doctors from producing any more progeny.

‘Hence the nickname of Cookie, which the Duke and Duchess of Windsor took care to promulgate throughout international society once Elizabeth proved herself to be their most formidable enemy.’

In the book – the first chapter of which has been published on her U.S. publishers’ website – Lady Colin, says Cecilia Glamis never recovered from the death in 1893 of their eldest child Violet.

She writes: ‘Claude Glamis had no problem fathering children, as his wife Cecilia had proven eight times over. Nor did she have problems producing healthy, happy, good-looking and charming children.

Lady Elizabeth with her parents and the Duke of York in January 1923 shortly before they got engaged

‘However, one of the tragedies that periodically happened in those pre-antibiotic days, might well have been the root of the problem.’ 

Violet died of heart failure following a bout of diphtheria, less than three weeks after Cecilia had given birth to her youngest son Michael.

According to Lady Campbell: ‘Lady Glamis was an exceptionally loving mother who lived primarily for her children. 

‘Already emotionally vulnerable following the latest birth, she was devastated by the death of this child whom she always said was “beautiful” and admitted to her dying day to missing.’ 

 

 

Lady Colin continues: ‘The fact is, she suffered a severe nervous breakdown from which she never entirely recovered.

‘She would always remain fragile, both physically and personally, and while she recovered sufficiently to resume her role in Society, she was prone to nervous attacks which incapacitated her for the remainder of her life.’

From left: Queen Mary, King George VI, Princess Elizabeth (later Queen Elizabeth II) holding Princess Anne, Duke of Edinburgh (Prince Philip) and Queen Elizabeth (‘Queen Mum’) holding Prince Charles

The author says that some people did know the truth surrounding the Queen Mother’s birth, chiefly her brother-in-law, David. 

‘As King Edward VIII, David had access to all the information about Elizabeth’s secret which was not so secret in aristocratic and royal circles.

‘When he discovered, to his horror, that Elizabeth was actively scheming with his own courtiers to undermine his position as king and prevent him from marrying the woman he loved, he used the wealth of access at his disposal to circumvent his own private and deputy private secretaries and obtain sight of the documents, which confirmed that Elizabeth had been born, not of 4th August as supposed, but on 3rd August at St Paul’s Waldenbury to Marguerite Rodiere.’ 

 

Lady Colin continued: ‘The Duke of Windsor always maintained that he would never have revealed Elizabeth’s secret had he not discovered at the time of the Abdication Crisis, through Lord Beaverbrook, that Elizabeth was behind the scurrilous and utterly untrue rumour that Wallis (Simpson) had learnt secret sexual techniques in a bordello in China, and it was this which was the secret hold she had over King Edward VIII.

The publication of the extracts could not have been more ill-timed, as the Queen on Friday held a service of remembrance for her beloved mother to mark the 10th anniversary of her death

 

‘Once he knew this to be true, however, he felt justified in rumbling the sister-in-law who had a secret of her own, and one, moreover, which had in his view, more merit than the one she had invented about his beloved.’ 

Lady Colin says that’s why thereafter, Elizabeth was known as Cookie.

She writes: ‘For those who asked, as I did when I was a late teenager, why she was being called by that nickname, there was always a member of the Windsor circle willing and able to recount how the High and Mighty Princess Elizabeth, Queen of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, Empress of India, Queen of Canada, Australia, etc,etc, was not even legitimate, but the daughter of the 13th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne and St Paul’s Waldenbury cook, Mademoiselle Marguerite Rodiere.

‘Whether this was indeed the case, none of us will ever know definitively unless DNA studies are done on Elizabeth and Cecilia to establish whether they shared a genetic link.’ 

Royal biographer Michael Thornton said: ‘It actually doesn’t make any sense. I did investigate all these rumours while I was researching Royal Feud, and I found absolutely no hard evidence whatever to support them.’

 

 

 

Surrogacy and the upper classes

It was not unusual for the upper classes to use ‘surrogacy’ arrangements to create large families

It was not unusual for the upper classes to use ‘surrogacy’ arrangements to create large families, the book claims.

In the days before antibiotics, child mortality rates were high and sole male heirs stood a good chance of being killed in a war.

As a result, Lady Colin claims it was important that aristocrats left a ‘spare heir or two’, and sometimes enlisted the aid of their domestic staff.

‘The grander the couple, the more likely that there was a serious problem, for great estates were entailed upon the title, meaning that a peer could not leave his property to whom he pleased,’ she said.

‘The aristocracy was filled with horror stories about widows and daughters of great peers living in penury while some distant cousin was lording it over them.’ 

Lady Colin refers to the time when George VI allegedly took offence to the growing friendship between the young Princess Elizabeth and ‘Little Porchy’, who later became Lord Carnarvon.

According to Lady Colin, the King is alleged to have said: ‘Young Porchester is charming, but there is no possibility of my condoning a union between a daughter of mine and a butler’s son.’

Writer who revealed the ‘secrets’ of Diana in first warts-and-all account of marriage to Charles

Lady Colin Campbell was brought up as male until she was 18

Colourful biographer Lady Campbell first annoyed the upper classes with her explosive 1992 biography of Diana, Princess of Wales.

Called Diana In Private, it was the first warts-and-all account of her disastrous marriage to Charles and came out shortly before Andrew Morton’s controversial biography.

Lady Campbell, also known as Georgie Campbell, later published a second book, The Real Diana, which revealed more shocking ‘secrets’ including a string of alleged affairs. Scandalous at the time, the book was derided by royal experts.

In 2004 she claimed Diana and King Juan Carlos of Spain had had an affair during a cruise in August 1986.

She wrote: ‘Diana did it to make Charles jealous, but it didn’t work. Charles couldn’t have cared less.’ 

Born in 1949 into the Ziadie family, one of Jamaica’s most influential clans, Lady Campbell was first registered as a boy, George William, due to a physical defect. 

She continued to be brought up as male until she was 18, when she had an operation to correct the defect.

She spent much of her early life in  the U.S. and later worked as a model in New York, where she was regarded as a society beauty.

She moved to Britain after marrying Colin Campbell, younger brother of the 12th Duke of Argyll, but the union lasted only 14 months. 

A newspaper later claimed her husband had not known about her physical history when they married and that some of his friends alleged that he had married a transvestite.

Lady Campbell successfully sued every newspaper that implied this, and blamed her ex for selling the story.

She said at the time: ‘It was awful. It is offensive beyond belief. It was rape.’

Seven years ago she was forced to pulp her book about a ruthless murderess after the world’s richest widow, Lily Safra, threatened to sue her.

She re-published her book Empress Bianca with certain tweaks, insisting it was fiction.