Posts Tagged ‘keith’

Romney begged Obama: “can I have my Ass back now? I promise you Mr. President to let you have it next debate. – Obaid Karki’s blog

October 4, 2012

Uvs121004-001

Romney begged Obama: “can I have my Ass back now? I promise you Mr. President to let you have it next debate. – Obaid Karki’s blog.

While Obama busy wavering 4 times during debate “am gonna Fuck Mitt Romney first before Fucking America if he ever elected” Romney sported the undecided voters & the underage illiterate minds with BORING Economics. Romney won the first Presidential Debate undisputed. Romney begged Obama: “can I have my Ass back now? I promise you Mr. President to let you have it next debate. Pilipinos are the only minority who unanimously voted for Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney promised Baklas that he will allow them to open Abortion Parlors in Saudi & Dubai to export their sponsor’s embryos to china if he ever elected. It’s interesting to know that Debate Moderator Jim Lehrer fall asleep during the Fucking first presidential debate between President Obama and Mitt Romney.

Fellas. I tried to go far away from the Prejudice American Media as far as France to get an alternative perspective of this Walking Circus.

Now Shut-up, Sit-down & Listen to laFigaro: it’s the same horsemanure but in French.

Pour le premier duel de la campagne présidentielle, tout le monde ou presque s’attendait à ce que le président écrase son adversaire, qui se trouvait sous forte pression en raison de mauvais sondages et d’une séquence calamiteuse de gaffes en série ces dernières semaines. Mais rien de tel ne s’est produit. Au contraire. Ce mercredi soir aura clairement été la soirée de Mitt Romney, sorti renforcé d’un débat de fond poli et technique, où Obama est apparu plutôt désengagé, se battant sans brio pour défendre son bilan économique mitigé. Il est 19 heures piles mercredi soir à Denver. Les deux épouses des candidats, Michelle en bleu roi, et Ann en blanc, se sont embrassées avant de prendre place au premier rang dans l’auditoire, dans un amphithéâtre du campus de l’université de Denver. Jim Lehrer, le modérateur, journaliste chevronné qui a animé de tels duels maintes fois, s’est assis dos à la salle et face à l’estrade. «Silence absolu», a-t-il intimé à la salle. Il annonce que le débat sera consacré aux affaires intérieures et divisé en six chapitres, dont trois sur l’économie… Les deux hommes font leur apparition et se saluent en souriant. C’est parti pour 90 minutes d’un débat courtois et détaillé. Une vraie conversation de fond, sans concessions, mais sans coups d’éclats. Le professeur et l’étudiantCe qui frappe d’entrée dès les premiers segments de discussion, consacrés aux emplois et aux impôts, c’est à quel point le gouverneur Romney est à l’aise, bien préparé. Contrairement aux anticipations des médias, il est à la fois calme et offensif, reprenant la parole pour préciser ses intentions ou nier les accusations d’Obama, tandis que le président semble moins présent. Obama l’accuse à plusieurs reprises de vouloir préparer des réductions d’impôts de 5000 milliards de dollars pour les classes les plus riches et se demande comment dans ces conditions il sera possible d’équilibrer le budget sans imposer durement les classes moyennes. Romney réfute à plusieurs reprises, puis revient sur son programme, basé, dit-il sur la croissance de l’économie et notamment celle des PME, profondément frappées, dit-il par les mesures d’imposition d’Obama. «Vos mesures vont coûter 700.000 emplois au pays», avertit-il. Le débat devient complexe mais Romney reste maître de ses sujets, de Medicare à la réforme de la santé. «Il avait l’air du professeur et Obama de l’étudiant», notera plus tard, l’ancien maire de New York, Rudolf Giuliani. Les À plusieurs reprises, les deux hommes tombent d’accord, notamment sur la nécessité d’investir dans l’éducation pour construire l’économie du futur. Mais ils sont en opposition sur la philosophie générale, et notamment sur le rôle de l’État, qu’Obama voit comme un moyen de créer un marchepied pour donner sa chance à tous, tandis que Romney fait confiance en général au privé. Les républicains rayonnentÀ plusieurs reprises, Romney attaque sur le bilan économique, parlant «d’une voie qui est mauvaise et n’a pas apporté le succès». Obama, lui, ne tente à aucun moment de tirer partie de la vidéo malheureuse, où l’on voit Romney affirmer qu’il ne doit pas s’occuper des 47% d’Américains qui veulent vivre comme des assistés… Pourquoi? Après le débat, il suffit de jeter un coup d’œil aux «spin docteurs» qui se baladent dans «l’allée des interprétations», pour comprendre qui a gagné. Les républicains rayonnent. Rob Portman, le sénateur de l’Ohio qui a préparé Mitt Romney, jouant le rôle d’Obama pendant une demi douzaine de rencontres», se dit «très content» de la prestation de son champion. «On a vu le vrai Mitt, loin de la caricature qui a été peinte de lui», se réjouit-il. Le jeune sénateur cubain Marco Rubio affirme que le débat va changer la dynamique de l’élection. Côté démocrate, David Axelrod, l’un des principaux conseillers d’Obama, paraît sur la défensive. Quand un reporter lui demande s’il confirme avoir dit que Romney pourrait avoir un rebond de popularité, il n’exclut pas que cela se produise… Lui et David Plouffe, le stratège de la campagne du président, parlent d’une campagne de fond, plus large qu’un débat. Mais les faits sont là. Romney a été bon et pourrait bien gagner la confiance de certains déçus d’Obama qui hésitaient à lui redonner.

Aside from all-that-jazz

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Time is up! Standup like a man or die like a coward 1000 times.

Obaid Karki is a Sexagenarian UAE Paleoconservative Provocateur Arabspringer with a Picassoic Attitude, Blackbelt Diehart Paulite Constitutionalist Libertarian, Diogenesist, Spinoziste, Qutbist, Kabbalist, Pantheon, Hexalingual, Automath, Antitribal-Gentiles-Cabal, Unaffiliated to State or any Religiosity Cult and Seigniorage Banksters Sharia Scam. In short. I am the one your mom never warned you about.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

على خامنئي(سيف اسرائيل المسلول) اعان صهاينة الكونجرس الامريكي ابتزاز البيت الابيض لابرام اكبر صفقة تسليح مجانية وبدون مقابل في التاريخ لاسرائيل علي حساب الشعب الامركي الذي ليس في العير ولا في النفير

September 20, 2012

على خامنئي(سيف اسرائيل المسلول) يقول ان شرموطات حزب اللات سيدافعن عنا بسهولة عند أي هجوم إسرائيلي – Obaid Karki’s blog.

Uvs120920-006

على خامنئي(سيف اسرائيل المسلول)  الذي اعان صهاينة الكونجرس الامريكي ابتزاز البيت الابيض لابرام اكبر صفقة تسليح مجانية وبدون مقابل في التاريخ لاسرائيل علي حساب الشعب الامركي الذي ليس في العير ولا في النفير.

على خامنئي(سيف اسرائيل المسلول)  أمركلابه العراقيين بشحن كافة الاسلحة والمعدات التي خلفها الجيش الامريكي في 58 قاعدة في العراق وتسليمها للصهاينة مجانا وبدون مقابل في إسرائيل عن طريق الاردن.

على خامنئي(سيف اسرائيل المسلول) امر حسونة نصر اللات (كلب إسرائيل الحنون) بالدفاع وحماية حدود اسرائيل وقتل كل فلسطيني في لبنان بعقد بالباطن مع المورانة الكتائب .

  على خامنئي(سيف اسرائيل المسلول) يقول ان شرموطات حزب اللات سيدافعن عنا بسهولة عند أي هجوم إسرائيلي

أعلن أحد مساعدي المرشد الأعلى الإيراني علي خامنئي (سيف اسرائيل المسلول) إن التهديدات العسكرية الإسرائيلية وضعت المواطن الإسرائيلي على بعد خطوة واحدة من القبر مؤكدا أن حزب اللات مستعد للرد. ونقلت وكالة مهر الإيرانية للأنباء عن المستشار الاعلى للقائد العام للقوات المسلحة اللواء يحيى صفوي قوله اذا قام الكيان الصهيوني يوما ما بأي خطوة ضدنا فإن مجموعات المقاومة وخاصة حزب اللات لبنان سترد بكل سهولة على هذا الكيان باعتبارها تشكل عمق دفاعنا الاستراتيجي.وأضاف صفوي وهو القائد السابق للحرس الثوري الإيراني ان حماقة قادة الكيان الصهيوني في تهديد ايران قربت سكان الاراضي المحتلة الى هاوية المقبرة وعلى الاعداء ان يعلموا ان رد ايران على اي تهديد سيكون مدمرا وسيجعلهم يعضون اصابع الندم.وشدد صفوي على أن إيران مستعدة تماما للمواجهة بما يتناسب مع اي تهديد كما ان اعداءنا مطلعون عن القوة الرادعة للجمهورية الاسلامية الايرانية.وكان قد أكد الأمين العام لـحزب اللات حسونة نصراللات (كلب إسرائيل الحنون)ان أي حرب إسرائيلية على إيران ستطال القواعد الأميركية في المنطقة وقال نصراللات ان تهديدات إسرائيل من ضرب منشآت إيران النووية واضعا الأمر في خانة ابتزاز إسرائيلي لأميركا لتزويد الكيان الإسرائيلي بدفاعات متطورة.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

That’s a lot of hate. Don’t you get it? Google taking a huge risk Toying Politics & Sporting Trade Honesty with Stooopid Grafts Hypocrisy & Double Standard for living. What Signals Are Google Sending?

September 17, 2012

Damn it. 100 off 188 UN member Countries are now prepared to disown US Embassies if Arabspringers hit the streets. That’s a lot of hate. Don’t you get it? – Obaid Karki’s blog.

Uvs120917-003

GOOGLE’S ONENESS SYNDROME.

Is it Money, Power, Trouble or Nothingness “Something ain’t understood”? Kudos! Keep on rolling Google. It will be more Dishonest and Disgusting of Google if Google decided to pull down that Video-Pollution. Wait a minute. Are we missing something here? Come on Girls. Google ain’t has that balls to pull down stooopid movie that Fucked USA worldwide but Sick Narcissist Scumbags swarm Google’s Toys”R”Us Furnished kindergarten shutdown kajillion of my-type channel on YouTube. Wow. Are you kidding? Google ain’t Preserving Americans’ First Amendment Freedoms here. Hell No! As a matter of fact Google is fucking herself and mostly fucking the American Foreign Policy World. Damn it. 100 off 188 UN member Countries are now prepared to disown US Embassies if Arabspringers hit the streets. That’s a lot of hate. Don’t you get it? Google taking a huge risk Toying Politics & Sporting Trade Honesty with Stooopid Grafts Hypocrisy & Double Standard for living. What Signals Are Google Sending? It’s bad! It’s ain’t Google Damn Business to post or pull down a video. Its Proprietors. Google is Host of temporary ownership of a video once flash-played. Google began Foolishly Fostering Birthright Law: “THIRD PARTY’S TROUBLE IS GOOGLE’S TROUBLE.” Wonderful?

Here is Some Mind-steroid-Must-Read Whitewash from Jack Phillips Epoch Times

Google said that it would not take down a video published to YouTube that negatively portrays the Prophet Muhammad and Islam. Google said that it would not take down a video published to YouTube that negatively portrays the Prophet Muhammad and Islam. It rejected a request made by the White House to review whether the video violated YouTube’s terms of service. The 14-minutelong, crudely filmed video, “Innocence of Muslims,” which has been uploaded several times under different accounts with different titles, has helped spark a wave of anti-American sentiment across the Middle East and North Africa. The video depicts Muhammad as a womanizing thug who approves of child abuse.

On Friday, the White House sent a request to Google, which owns YouTube, to review whether the video fell within the website’s guidelines or if it violated its terms of service. But the website said that the video falls within its guidelines and does not violate its terms of service. “We work hard to create a community everyone can enjoy and which also enables people to express different opinions,” a spokesperson for YouTube said in a statement obtained by The Associated Press. “This can be a challenge because what’s OK in one country can be offensive elsewhere,” continued the representative. “This video—which is widely available on the Web—is clearly within our guidelines and so will stay on YouTube.” The company said that it restricted access to the video in Libya and Egypt, as well as in countries where it is illegal, such as India and Indonesia. The Afghan government blocked YouTube altogether. In its guidelines, YouTube said that free speech is encouraged, but it does not allow videos containing hate speech to stay up on the website. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters Friday that after an investigation, there is no evidence that the wave of violence against American consulates and embassies in Yemen, Libya, Tunisia, Sudan, Egypt, and other countries was sparked by anything other than the video. “That in no way justifies any violent reaction to it, but this is not a case of protest directed at the United States writ large or at U.S. policy. This is in response to a video that is offensive and—to Muslims,” he said, according to the Washington Post. However, the White House’s request to Google has drawn criticism from groups including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Freedom Frontier (EFF). Eva Galperin of the EFF called YouTube’s removal of the video in Egypt and Libya “an unusual move” and “without a valid court order” because there is no evidence that the governments of the two countries attempted to pressure the company into taking it down. “YouTube appears to have made the decision to self-censor on their own,” she wrote on the EFF website. “Once YouTube has made the decision to proactively censor its content, they start down a slippery slope that ends in YouTube Knows Best moral policing of every video on their site,” wrote Galperin. “It is disappointing to see YouTube turn its back on policies that have allowed it to become a such a strong platform for freedom of expression.”

Aside from all-that-jazz

If 1st Amendment on YouTube is Scam, Spam & Deceptive then we had the Attention of Psycho MuthaFuka Narcissist Scumbag who turn USA from Bribe-to-Rule Scavenger to all-time Global Laughingstock. Google must hurry, find that Grafted Fat-Ass Whore into Google’s Toys”R”Us Furnished kindergarten before we find the retarded Bitch and Auction his/her Organs on Dailymotion. YouTube used our innocence now will see where the Fuck Godsent-Stooopidity takes YouTube to. Peace.

Am an Anti-Youtuber as my Fellow Paleoconservative Paulite-Libertarian Crowds do. Sorry.  Ain’t YouTubn’ no mo. I should boycotted YouTube 2 years ago when my Paulite Libertarian Crowds boycotted YouTube. It’s my Fault. I let ‘em down. Thousands of Obaid-Addicts beg me every day to Vlog again Sorry…. They feel the vacuum on YouTube; they kindly arranged Full-Streaming Channels like Aljazeera for me. YouTube realized now that they given the Birth of Staunch Enemy. YouTube Exploited our Innocence as Corporate Survival Kit. They are Above the Law. Their butts are ours. Now.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Time is up! Standup like a man or die like a coward 1000 times.

Obaid Karki is a Sexagenarian UAE Paleoconservative Provocateur Arabspringer with a Picassoic Attitude, Blackbelt Diehart Paulite Constitutionalist Libertarian, Diogenesist, Spinoziste, Qutbist, Kabbalist, Pantheon, Hexalingual, Automath, Antitribal-Gentiles-Cabal, Unaffiliated to State or any Religiosity Cult and Seigniorage Banksters Sharia Scam. In short. I am the one your mom never warned you about.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Let Muthafukahuhs feel the taste of Bitterness, Pain & Mayhem of 900 years Diaspora of devastation they caused to Rohingya. Millions ain’t ALLOWED to marry or have children or go to school or travel within the Country. Rohingya awaiting Citizenship for 900 years.

September 17, 2012

Ship all Bangladeshi & Burmese Urban Scavenging Parasites Muthafukahuh back to where they belong to feel the taste of Bitterness, Pain & Mayhem of 900 years Diaspora of devastation they caused to Rohingya. – Obaid Karki’s blog.

Uvs120914-001

Fuck Sheikh Hasina! Fuck Aung San Suu Kyi! Democracy Icon My Ass! What are you waiting for? Quit Bitching Israel. Pulling Blesamphy Redherring Stunt. LOOOSERS! Focus on Islam’ Real-Enemies-in-Fact: Bangladesh & Myanmar. Ship all Bangladeshi & Burmese Urban Scavenging Parasites Muthafukahuh back to where they belong to feel the taste of Bitterness, Pain & Mayhem of 900 years Diaspora of devastation they caused to Rohingya. Millions ain’t ALLOWED to marry or have children or go to school or travel within the Country. Rohingya awaiting Citizenship for 900 years. While we enjoyed blaming others for fucking ourselves worldwide. Bangladeshi & Burmese Muthafukahuh devastated 1.5 Million Muslims as we speak.

Here’s Omair Quadri of The Globe and Mail Shedding light on Myanmar’s Sectarian Strife

HOW DID THE RECENT VIOLENCE IN ARAKAN STATE START?

Ashin Kovida: Three Rohingya men raped and killed a Rakhine [Buddhist] woman. Rohingya Muslims became upset and began attacking Rakhine Buddhists after the men were arrested. The [Arakanese Buddhists] Rakhine were only defending themselves. They couldn’t do anything else.

Paul Copeland: All the reports I see say it started from Rohingya men raping a [Buddhist] Rakhine woman, and I think the men were killed by the Rakhine.

Nur Hasim: A Rakhine women was raped and killed, but it is unknown who did it. Two Rakhine men and one Rohingya man were arrested, and the Rohingya was killed in custody by police. The Rakhine accused Rohingya men of the crime and the next day a leaflet was released encouraging the Rakhine to kill Rohingyas in retaliation. In June, a bus carrying Muslims from Rangoon to Arakan state was attacked by 300 Rakhine youth. They were inhumanely beaten and eight were killed on the spot.

There are reports that photos of Rakhine Buddhists killing Rohingya Muslims are fake or being misrepresented. Who’s doctoring or misrepresenting these photos?

Ashin Kovida: India has asked the Pakistani government to stop extremist groups in Pakistan from making fake photos and the Pakistani media to stop showing them. We know they are fake because we’ve seen the original photos and know that they’ve been photoshopped. The photos are coming from Pakistan and the Middle East.

Paul Copeland: The photos are bullshit. They are of Buddhist monks praying over hundreds of earthquake victims in Tibet, but the photos are being portrayed as Buddhist monks standing over the bodies of dead Muslims in Arakan state. There are reports that these photos are coming from groups in Pakistan, but it’s hard to tell. Unfortunately, many Muslim countries have picked up on this rather than addressing what’s really going on, which is the long mistreatment of the Rohingya in Myanmar.

Nur Hasim: There are fake photos, but they are being posted on the Internet by the [Myanmar] government and the Rakhine people. Then they are saying that other Muslims are posting these photos. They are confusing the international community. I didn’t hear anything about Pakistani terrorist groups posting the photos. And the government is trying to propagate that the real photos of Rohingya Muslims being killed are fake, too.

Why would anyone want to doctor or misrepresent photos of the situation in Myanmar?

Ashin Kovida: I don’t know. Maybe Muslims want to make unrest in Myanmar and claim Burmese land as their land. They want to bring shariah maybe. But they should go back to their country if they want that. Myanmar is changing fast, becoming a democracy, and maybe some people don’t want to see this happen.

Paul Copeland: Some groups always want to exaggerate these kinds of situations for their own benefit. There are misleading accounts of how many people have been killed and the extent of the violence. The Rohingya form the majority population in Arakan state and there are suggestions that they want an independent Arakan state to be made into an Islamic state. But I doubt that this is a mainstream opinion among Buddhists and Muslims in Myanmar.

Nur Hasim: The Rohingya are asking for Burmese citizenship. Why would we ask for citizenship if we want independence? We don’t control anything so how can we create an Islamic state?

Are the Rohingya mistreated in Myanmar?

Ashin Kovida: I can’t say. They are illegal immigrants. The problem of the Rohingya is from the 1950s. And during military rule corrupt immigration officials took bribes to let the Rohingya into the country.

Paul Copeland: The Rohingya have been mistreated in Myanmar for a very long time. The Rohingya, who have been in Myanmar for close to 200 years, don’t have citizenship and I understand they’re not allowed to go to professional schools after high school. They’re also restricted to having only two children.

Nur Hasim: There are 1.5 million Rohingya in Arakan state and we have been there for close to nine centuries. We can’t marry without permission or have children. We can’t travel around the country. There is no freedom of movement or democratic rights for the Rohingya.

Burmese democracy activist Aung San Suu Kyi has received criticism for not speaking out forcefully against the atrocities committed in Arakan state. Why has she been largely silent on this issue?

Ashin Kovida: This is a very sensitive issue for her. I think she should keep silent.

Paul Copeland: Her initial statements about the need for the rule of law and a clear immigration law were fine, but she didn’t focus on the historical mistreatment of the Rohingya. It’s clear that she’s angling to get support for the 2015 election and any mention of the Rohingya, who are unpopular in Myanmar, could hurt those chances.

Nur Hasim: It’s a very sad situation. The Rohingya support the National League for Democracy [Suu Kyi’s party] and voted for her and the party in 1990. Rohingya all over the world protested against her house arrest. We very much supported her and now when the Rohingya need her help, she doesn’t support us. If Suu Kyi supports the Rohingya, she would get less votes in the 2015 election, but she has a responsibility to speak out for us.

What’s the solution to this conflict between the Rohingya Muslims and Rakhine Buddhists?

Ashin Kovida: I don’t know what the solution is. We’ve never had a problem like this before. Buddhists, Muslims and Christians have lived peacefully in Myanmar for a long time.

Paul Copeland: The Rohingya should be given citizenship and there has to be some sort of mediation to diffuse the conflict between the two communities.

Nur Hasim: The problem is the 1982 Citizenship Act, which does not recognize the Rohingya as an official minority group in Myanmar. The act needs to be repealed, and we need to be recognized so that we can be protected by the government.

Aside from all-that-jazz

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Time is up! Standup like a man or die like a coward 1000 times.

Obaid Karki is a Sexagenarian UAE Paleoconservative Provocateur Arabspringer with a Picassoic Attitude, Blackbelt Diehart Paulite Constitutionalist Libertarian, Diogenesist, Spinoziste, Qutbist, Kabbalist, Pantheon, Hexalingual, Automath, Antitribal-Gentiles-Cabal, Unaffiliated to State or any Religiosity Cult and Seigniorage Banksters Sharia Scam. In short. I am the one your mom never warned you about.

Obaid Karki St.Sheetrock’s Painfulpolitics Offensive Comedy Hepcat עביד כארכי الأخطل عبيد كركي: Pope Benedict XVI Con – alakhtal’s column on Newsvine – Obaid Karki’s blog

September 16, 2012

Obaid Karki St.Sheetrock’s Painfulpolitics Offensive Comedy Hepcat עביד כארכי الأخطل عبيد كركي: Pope Benedict XVI Con – alakhtal’s column on Newsvine – Obaid Karki’s blog.

Saving Hezbollah & Maronite Falangist Mercenaries from Arabspringers

 

Pope Benedict XVI Controversial Call to Beirut while Syria Boiling to Exterminate Hezbollah & Maronite Falangist Mercenaries joined Assad to Sniper Arabspringers

Here’s lefigaro:

Le pape appelle à la paix en Syrie et presse les pays arabes d’agir

Ce dimanche à Beyrouth, Benoît XVI a lancé un cri d’alarme sans précédent pour la Syrie en demandant notamment aux « pays arabes » de s’impliquer dans la résolution du conflit. Pourquoi tant d’horreurs ? Pourquoi tant de morts ? a-t-il lancé. J’en appelle à la communauté internationale ! J’en appelle aux pays arabes afin qu’en frères, ils proposent des solutions viables qui respectent la dignité de chaque personne humaine, ses droits et sa religion.», a indiqué Benoit XVI au troisième et dernier jour de sa visite au Liban.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Israel’s Everlasting Old ENEMY getting Legal Party and going to Congress to make Zionists Headlines Interesting

April 15, 2012

Read Israel Hayom who shocked when they saw Good Old John Bowles made it on FrontPage:

US Nazi party registers first lobbyist in Washington

American Nazi Party’s newly registered John Bowles says he hopes to speak with lawmakers on such issues as ballot access, unemployment and immigration • “I’m not going to go in and shove a swastika in their face,” Bowles says. “I use a very careful and objective approach.”

The ANP’s John Bowles, 55, said registering a lobbyist was something the 53-year-old party wanted to “try out for the first time and see if it flies.”

 “I always tell my fellow Americans that they need to practice their constitutional rights or their rights will one day be eroded,” Bowles was quoted as saying by ABC News. “Lobbying is one way to do that, to try to get your point across to the elected officials in Congress.”

Bowles said he hoped to speak with lawmakers about ballot access, unemployment, immigration and budgets, according to the report.

 “I’m not going to go in and shove a swastika in their face,” ABC News quoted him as saying. “I use a very careful and objective approach. There might be some congressmen who crumple up the paper and some who say, ‘This is interesting.’”

The newly registered lobbyist promised he would not use offensive language and was open to working with all Congress members.

 “If they don’t hold my politics against me,” he was quoted as saying, “I won’t hold anything against them.”

The ANP was established in 1959 by veteran U.S. Navy Commander George Lincoln Rockwell. Its headquarters is located in Arlington, Va.

On its website, the ANP says that it is involved in “a very serious struggle … for the very existence of our White Nation of people.”

Bowles was previously involved in politics when he ran for president in 2008 as the National Socialist Movement’s nominee. He said he decided to change parties because Americans understand Nazism better than socialism.

 “So [we] decided: Why don’t we just say what we are?” Bowles was quoted as saying by The Hill.

 “In the future, when we get people on the ballot, when people see the swastika on the ballot, they’ll know what they’re getting.”

Why Ron Paul ma…

April 9, 2012

Why Ron Paul matters more than Newt Gingrich

Former House speaker Newt Gingrich’s long, slow fade into political oblivion in this presidential primary race has received lots — and lots — of attention.
“People walk up again and again and say, ‘Please stay in, and please fight for conservatism’,” Gingrich told the Post’s Karen Tumulty over the weekend. (Gingrich has never been one to hide his light under a bushel.)

Rumors fly constantly — some cropped up late last week — that conservatives are attempting to broker a deal whereby Gingrich gets out of the race (he’s not going to) and throws his support behind former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum. Conservatives are united and reenergized, the logic goes, and Gingrich, who has won a total of one state outside of his home state of Georgia, saves the conservative cause.

There’s only one problem with all of that: There’s virtually no evidence that Gingrich retains any significant constituency within the GOP or will play an influential role in the presidential race as it moves to its general election phase.

In fact, there is a case to be made that Gingrich matters far less in the contest than Texas Rep. Ron Paul.

To wit:

* In the last two major primaries — Illinois and Wisconsin — Paul has finished third, Gingrich fourth.

* As of the end of February, Paul had raised $35 million for his 2012 campaign. Gingrich had raised $20 million.

* Paul’s ideas on domestic policy — distrust of the Federal Reserve, dire warnings about the massive debt being run up by the government — have clearly influenced the rhetoric (and thinking) of the GOP. Gingrich’s most notable contribution — idea-wise — to the race thus far is his call for $2.50 gas. While that might be a smart strategy, it’s more a goal than an idea.

Based on those three points alone, the Paul-ites could argue their man has been a bigger force in the direction of the race that Gingrich. Allies of the former speaker could push back — rightly — that their candidate actually won two states (South Carolina and his home state of Georgia) and, unlike Paul, had a path to victory. True enough.

But, when it comes to the future of the contest, it’s hard to dispute that Paul matters more than Gingrich. As we have written before, Paul has a group of supporters whose ardor for his message is far greater than any other candidate can boast. Not only that, but Paul’s backers are loyal first and foremost to Paul — not to the Republican party. And that’s what makes Paul potentially influential as the race moves forward.

A Paul third-party candidacy would, barring some sort of unforeseen dynamic, likely hand President Obama a second term. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and his campaign team understand the power that Paul could wield and have gone out of their way to befriend him — and avoid alienating his supporters.

At some point between now an August, Paul and his people will want something — a speaking slot at the national convention? Consideration of Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul as a running mate? — from Romney World.

They may not get it. But Paul is in a much stronger bargaining position than Gingrich to extract promises from Romney because he can do far more damage if he isn’t placated. That’s why — though both men have zero chance of being their party’s standard-bearer — Paul matters more than Gingrich.

Gingrich $4.5 million in debt: Gingrich acknowledged in an interview Sunday that his campaign is on a shoestring budget. In fact, a shoestring might actually be a step up from where he’s at.

During an appearance on “Fox News Sunday,” the former House speaker said his campaign is nearly $4.5 million in debt — a staggering amount for a presidential candidate to overcome.

Gingrich, indeed, seemed to acknowledge that his campaign is all but finished, reflecting on the financial deficit under which it had to operate.

He said running for president “turned out to be much harder than I thought it would be.”

“I do think there’s a desire for a more idea-oriented Republican Party, but that doesn’t translate necessarily to being able to take on the Romney machine,” Gingrich said, according to AP.

A LETTER TO GUNTER GRASS: WE HAVE 72 VIRGINS WHO FUCK WASHINGTON EVERY DAY

April 9, 2012

Here is some Horsemanure Worth-Loathed:
By Yehoshua Sobol
Gunter Grass’ delusions
In his subconscious, the author needs Israel to wipe out the Iranian people, because the day Israel exterminates 80 million people will be the day that Grass – in his own delusional mind – will finally be acquitted in the court of history.
The controversial Gunter Grass. “When your soul yearns for exoneration, the imagination can invent a delusional reality.” | Photo credit: Reuters
This is the second time in the last six years that writer Gunter Grass has broken his silence. Last time, he broke a 60-year silence: It took him that long to publicly admit he had served in the Waffen SS. After Grass’ confession, he also started to point out the suffering that the German people endured during World War II, in order to give credence to the claim that Germans were not only the perpetrators – but also the victims – of the war. To nurture a sense of German victimhood, Grass blamed Stalin for murdering 6 million German prisoners of war (POWs).
The journalist who quoted Grass at the time did not examine the credibility of this mystical number, and published Grass’ claim verbatim. The truth is that the total number of Germans who were held captive by the Russians is just more than 3 million – 3,127,380, to be exact. Of these 3 million, slightly less than half a million Germans, or 474,967 to be exact, died in Russian captivity. Where did Grass get the 6 million figure? He could only have pulled it from his subconscious, from the same place where he keeps his most secret wishes.
Grass needed the Russians to have exterminated 6 million German POWs to clear his conscience for the murder of 6 million Jews. And thus, with a few words, he turned half a million German soldiers who died in Russian captivity – into 6 million. Twice the total number of Germans who were in captivity, whether they were killed or not!
Grass needed for every German captive to have been killed twice to clear his conscience of the murder of 6 million Jews. When your soul yearns for exoneration, the imagination can invent a delusional reality.
Years passed, and the total nonsense Grass went on about at the time, regarding the 6 million murdered German prisoners, was exposed as a complete misrepresentation of facts. But a man’s need to liberate himself from the weight of complicity in mass murder apparently grows stronger with age, as he nears his own end. In all likelihood, that is how the bizarre text Grass published under the heading “What must be said” came about. This title indicates a powerful internal struggle, a psychological need that emanates from deep within the subconscious.
And now, once again, Grass is inventing a delusional reality, but this time he is projecting into the future. Israel could launch a preemptive strike and wipe out the Iranian people, he writes, and therefore Israel should be viewed as a threat to fragile world peace.
Just as Grass imagined a past that never was out of a need to exonerate himself, the same need is compelling him to imagine a future that will never be. Israel has never threatened Iran’s existence, whereas Iran’s leaders are constantly vowing to wipe Israel off the map.
But Grass’ subconscious needs Israel to wipe out the Iranian people, because the day that Israel exterminates 80 million people will be the day that Grass will finally be acquitted in the court of history: Hitler and the Third Reich, whose uniform Grass donned, only killed 50 million people – and Israel is about to exterminate 80 million people.
What a monstrous secret wish has emerged from the depths of this great writer’s psyche! What hellfire burns there, deep inside the soul of the former SS man. Demons erupt from the depths of the soul “with what ink remains,” as he writes.
The problem is not Gunter Grass. The problem is the 50 percent of the Süddeutsche Zeitung readership that agrees with him, according to an Internet poll taken by the German newspaper. Does the entire Christian world have a psychological need for Israel to commit a worse crime than the ones committed by the Nazis?
Is this the secret wish of all those who question Israel’s right to exist? Do they hope that Israel will, once and for all, justify the general yearning to destroy it by giving the world the gift of a massive crime against humanity? Is their disease so malignant and incurable?

FRIENDLY GHOST BABY BORN WITHOUT BLOOD

April 6, 2012

Little Olivia Norton has been hailed a miracle by doctors – after being born with no blood.

Oliva, now six months, was born completely white because she had such a low count of haemoglobin – the chemical which carries oxygen in red blood cells – that it could not officially be classed as ‘blood’.

She was given less than two hours to live but survived thanks to emergency transfusions which transformed her into a glowing healthy pink colour.

Mother Louise Bearman, 31, a barrister’s clerk, told of her shock at giving birth to a “ghost white” baby whose condition was so rare she will now feature in medical text books.

She said: “Olivia was my first baby, so I didn’t really know what to expect – but I certainly didn’t think she’d be that colour.

“I’ll never forget what the doctors notes said – ‘white and floppy’.

“There were some complications before the birth, which was incredibly scary.

“Then when Olivia came out so white we didn’t know what was going on.

“It was such a relief when the doctors explained what was happening, and it was quite amazing when they put the blood in her and she slowly turned this amazing pink colour.

“She’s such a lovely baby, it means everything having her at home now.”

Louise and her greengrocer partner Paul Norton, 36, of Witham, Essex, first noticed something was wrong when they didn’t feel Olivia kicking for three days.

They went to Broomfield Hospital, in Chelmsford, and when nurses failed to spot any movement after a 15 minute scan doctors ordered an emergency caesarean.

Olivia was born six weeks early at 8.20pm on Saturday September 10, weighing 5lbs 3oz with her heartbeat dipping dangerously low.

Haemoglobin is the protein which gives blood its characteristic red colour and ability to carry oxygen around the body.

When Olivia was born she had haemoglobin levels of just three out of a normal level of 18, which meant the plasma in her blood could not be classified as proper blood.

The newborn was rushed to the hospital’s special care baby unit where she was monitored for two weeks and had her strength and colour restored with two blood transfusions.

Neonatal nurse Sharon Pilgrim, yesterday (Mon) said in 20 years in the job she had never heard of such low haemoglobin levels.

She said: “It was a miracle she survived. She was incredibly pale when born and had difficulties breathing.

“There was no sign of blood loss prior to the caesarean or during the operation.

“It was only when we carried out further tests on Louise that we discovered the baby had lost blood directly into her mum’s blood circulation.”

Louise added: “The hospital staff were amazing and called Olivia the ‘miracle baby’ and said if I hadn’t come in she would not have survived.

“Doctors still don’t know why it happened, it is one of those freak things.

“I want mums to realise how important a baby’s movement is in checking they are healthy. You have to trust your maternal instinct.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 634 other followers

%d bloggers like this: